Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
HELP!!!!
by: phssthpok - Sept 12, 2013 9:22:52 GMT -5
Post by phssthpok on Sept 12, 2013 9:22:52 GMT -5
the fresh gas is the first red flag to jump to mind. it's possible you got a bad batch... perhaps with some water in it?
If there was some water in the gas, then it would settle and stratify while you ate dinner. This would leave the water at the bottom of the tanks where it would be pulled into the carb first. if the bowl of the carb is mostly filled with water, then as you throttle up the small amount of gas on top would get used up and the engine would be trying to draw a mixture of gas and water, which won't burn for crap.
I'd suggest, as an easy first step, draining the bowl of the carburetor, and possibly even draining off some of the fuel tank (after letting it sit still for, say... half an hour) to make sure there's no water.
This would also be a good time to check the fuel filter. If the in-ground tanks at the station were just filled, there's a good possibility of solid contaminants still swirling around in the fuel when you filled up. A plugged filter would restrict the amount of fuel flowing into the bowl.
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Sept 11, 2013 16:46:57 GMT -5
To expand on the temp change issue: Air density is affected by temperature (as well as elevation but that's not the topic here). The ideal ( stoichometric) mixture is a 14.7:1 ratio of Oxygen to Gasoline *. The atmosphere contains 'X' amount of oxygen along with various other gasses at any given volume. If you seal off a container of air (say, a tin can), and heat it, the gas will attempt to expand, but being trapped in a rigid container, it will only be able to build pressure...the density remains the same because the volume remains the same. Place the same amount of air in a flexible container (say, a balloon) and heat it, and the container will change volume allowing the gas to physically expand (lose density). Inversely, if you run the same experiment but chill the containers instead of heating them, you get the opposite effect on the balloon...it shrinks (reducing it's volume) as the density of the gas inside increases. Now, to apply this to a carburetor. The mechanical fuel metering system in a carburetor relies upon air pressure differentials to pull fuel into the airstream as it passes through the throat of the carburetor. The carburetor has no way of measuring air density, only air volume as a byproduct of the Venturi effect of the air passing through the carburetor. For any given volume of air, the density (read: concentration) of oxygen molecules will decrease as temperatures increase, and vice-versa. So as temperatures drop, the concentration ( density) of oxygen molecules for any given volume of air passing into the engine will increase, resulting in a 'leaning' effect...more oxygen molecules added to the same amount of fuel (with the opposite happening as temperatures increase). The greater the temperature change, the greater the effect. Eventually the distorted air/fuel ratio will become noticeable as a change in engine performance. Generally this temperature induced distortion can be fixed with just a twist of the mixture screw. You shouldn't have to re-jet unless you run into severe seasonal temperature extremes...like my cabin in Montana which can swing from +38c in the height of summer to -40c in the depths of winter. Too-long, didn't-read version: Yes, temperature CAN affect mixture ratios (carb tune), but in general it's nothing a little twist of the mixture screw can't resolve. * I have always found it interesting that the Stoich. ratio for gasoline is essentially the exact same number as the atmospheric pressure at sea level (in PSI)
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Sept 10, 2013 16:33:42 GMT -5
I didn't find this *quite* worthy of it's own thread, but it is amusing so I'm going to drop it on the coat-tails of this one.. ;D
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Sept 7, 2013 21:22:36 GMT -5
That routing would be ideal, so long as you can ensure there is no vacuum leak where it connects to the manifold.
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Sept 7, 2013 12:13:58 GMT -5
If you plumb it to the airbox install a catch tube about halfway with a T connect and hose - preferably clear. Otherwise the oil that does get by gets into your airbox and eventually, your carb. You make a good point, but I would consider that a small maintenance price to pay. An occasional inspection/cleaning of the carburetor/air box would probably be a good thing in the long run. Perhaps in the process of constructing the catch-can the plumbing from the can on the vacuum side could be a reduced diameter that would fit the manifold port as well, thereby bypassing the air box/carburetor altogether and negating any carb fouling possibilities?
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Sept 7, 2013 9:19:02 GMT -5
I wonder if the Koreans are ever going to try breaking into the bike market like they did with Hyundai, and Kia in the car market. (I'd love to see a bike analog to Hyundai's 250hp 3.8l rear-wheel-drive Genesis coupe)
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Sept 7, 2013 9:07:50 GMT -5
do not cap the vent ... if you cap it, it will build pressure and bad things will happen. ...put a hose on the valve cover vent ...and route it toward the bottom of the scoot, leave it open. I am FAR from a tree huggin' bunny luver, but there's no reason to vent the crankcase * to the open air when you have a perfectly serviceable air box to plumb the hose into. The vapors from the crankcase will get sucked into the airflow and burned, rather than dumping unburned fuel (blow-by) and hot oil vapors into the environment. Cars have a PCV valve in the valve cover that is typically plumbed to the engine side of the throttle blade(s) in order to scavenge these vapors. Ideally, you would plumb the valve cover (middle red circle) to the intake manifold (top red circle), but unless you want to futz around with patching together differing diameters of hoses, then plumbing it to the air box (preferably the engine side of the filter element to ensure vacuum) is a close second. *The crankcase is directly linked to the area underneath the valve cover via the timing chain passage.
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
new product
by: phssthpok - Sept 6, 2013 10:47:14 GMT -5
Post by phssthpok on Sept 6, 2013 10:47:14 GMT -5
For summer cooling: Small cooler Ice Small 12v pump Clear aquarium tubing 'Sacrificial' riding jacket Some creative tailoring should allow you to stitch the tubing into the 'core' areas of the jacket. Hook up the tag ends of the tubing to the pump and have it circulate the cold water from the ice in the cooler (strapped to the luggage rack) through the jacket and back to the cooler. Top off the ice when you stop to top off the tank. When you get off the bike the only thing you lose when you 'unplug' from the hoses is a bit of water. You could even carry a couple of golf tee's around to plug the hoses from the cooler and to keep the jacket from draining (read: having to wait around for the jacket to drain so you're not leaving water dribbles everywhere).
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
FINALLY!
by: phssthpok - Sept 4, 2013 11:07:03 GMT -5
Post by phssthpok on Sept 4, 2013 11:07:03 GMT -5
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Aug 31, 2013 21:33:00 GMT -5
Although the cams may appear the same to the naked eye, they are not. a whole thread was just written on this. I did not see that thread , can you post a link to it .John HERE
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Aug 31, 2013 16:57:42 GMT -5
For that reason you must go manually geared... Oh, you'll get no argument from me that a direct chain drive is more efficient from an engineering standpoint. I'm just trying to work with what I actually have, not what I'd like to have. Although, that has sparked an interesting concept in my brain. Imagine in your mind a typical GY-6 CVT transmission. On the front end (the variator assembly) replace the outer face with a 'puck' of chain-gears, and have the inner face acting upon a shift lever for a derailleur. The derailleur would be placed at the mid-point between the drive side (variator) and the driven side (clutch), and a counter spring added between the front 'puck' and the engine side variator face to cause down-shift as engine speed decreases (essentially moving the counter spring from the driven side of the transmission to the drive side). The clutch assembly would remain the same and allow for the gears to spin freely at idle (and thus downshift into the lowest gear). The clutch counter-spring would be eliminated, and the outer face of the clutch pulley would have a similar sized 'puck' of gears oriented in the opposite direction, such that at idle speeds the smallest gear up front/tallest gear in back would be engaged. As engine speed increases, the variator face would move away from the engine, actuating the derailleur to 'shift' to the next step (moving the chain on both gear-sets at the same time owing to the short distance between the derailleur and either gear-set). This would have the same effect as the CVT (insomuch as the gear ratio would improve as speeds allowed the engine to reach it's power-band) yet have the added efficiency of a direct chain drive, though admittedly with not anywhere as smooth of a transition. All of this is presuming, of course, that one would want to keep the 'automatic' transmission of a scooter. If you are into manual shifting there's no reason to retain the front variator assembly...simply mount a gear-shift lever someplace readily accessible, and remember to downshift at the stoplights (IMHO the 'automatic clutch' is just too bone simple and convenient to give up though ) Thoughts? (Bear in mind this is mostly a 'thought experiment'...the odds of actually getting into something like this are slim to none owing to a lack of funds and/or a sacrificial testbed machine)
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Aug 30, 2013 7:43:24 GMT -5
Definitely LED. The light output is directional (up), the 'bulb' looks clear until lit (when it shines red), and the output does not fluctuate or pulse at idle the way the incandescent head/tail lights do.
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Aug 29, 2013 17:54:47 GMT -5
There seem to be various styles of mirrors w/lights in them, but on mine (Roketa MC-04 Aruba/Fiji), there is the tiny incandescent turn signal bulb mounted vertically behind a pointed, yellow reflector/lens, and a tiny little LED mounted vertically just to the outside of the lens which lights up red when the engine is running. Is this what you are talking about?
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
Post by phssthpok on Aug 29, 2013 10:40:35 GMT -5
The 127cc I have right now, has proven a lot better than I thought it would be! ~114MPG is AmAzInG Now put a fairing on it and see what you can get for milage!
|
|
Sophomore Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 163
Likes: 15
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
|
A9 cam...
by: phssthpok - Aug 28, 2013 16:10:24 GMT -5
Post by phssthpok on Aug 28, 2013 16:10:24 GMT -5
The 'height' of the lobe from the center-line of the camshaft (AKA: Lift) is but one part of a cam lobe profile. There is also 'duration' to consider.
A marginally taller (or even stock height) lobe with a significantly longer duration (fatter lobe) may appear 'shorter' than a stock cam lobe to the naked eye due to the visual change in the ratio of lift to duration.
Also, cam lift can be modified by reducing the baseline diameter of the lobe, which would have the same effect as increasing the height of the lobe. This too can 'trick' the eye.
|
|