|
Post by bigguy on Mar 16, 2017 22:50:49 GMT -5
Hi Everyone, I recently invented a new mod for a motorcycle carrier, and I call it the Rich Hitch (pats himself on the back!) This is a modification to an existing motorcycle carrier. Here's the link to my blog with the description.Let me know what you think! -Rich
|
|
|
Post by rockynv on Mar 17, 2017 0:25:29 GMT -5
I was planning on doing the same however you do have to do the math and calculate weight transferance based on the distance of the load being carried from the center of the rear wheels to determine how much extending the carrier and load away from the hitch will have toward unloading the front wheels causing steering stability issues.
Motor homes usually do not have the hitch mounted to the chassis of the OEM vehicle its based on but an extension made of lighter gauge and strength steel. Motor home manufacturers may put a receiver that of iteself may have a very high tongue weight rating for a load placed within 12 inches of it however the sub frame its mounted on when talking motor homes is usually rated at less than 400 lbs unless your talking a HaulMark or similar SuperC based on an Interstate box truck cab and chassis. Air bags make no difference either. I have inspected a number of Class A and Class C Motor Homes where folks have beefed up hitches and after a few rides over rough roads end up with the rear frame over the axle cracked and a hump in the floor where the entire back of the motor home has dropped 1 to several inches. Trussing that back up and repairing the damage is very difficult since you have to evenly lift everthing back into its original location which may not be possible without removing the sidewalls, basement parts, etc. Been there helping others and its not pretty.
Blue OX used to have a calculation sheet that you could fill out with the length, front and rear axle locations along with the total weight and axle weights to see how much a load so many inches from the center of the rear axle would unload the front wheels. It was amazingly accurate at predicting the effects of the proposed load on steering but still did not overrride the Motor Home Builders rear frame limits. Unfortunately on many Motor Homes that info was on a sticky lable somewhere on the receiver, rear of the vehicle or possible on the wall in the back of a closet or some other obscure location.
Bottom line is that you can not rely on whats stamped on the receiver or what third party software indicates about the receiver itself especially when its mounted on a Class A or Class C motorhome and more so if its a gasoline powered front engine chassis.
I like the effort and would like even more to make the math work however its not going to for many and possibly most.
|
|
|
Post by bigguy on Mar 17, 2017 0:34:04 GMT -5
I feel really comfortable with the engineer's software results. He took measurements of ALL the structural metal, hitch, frame, etc., and the software generated the results. When you're talking hauling a motorcycle or scooter, I do believe 500-800 lbs can be carried by most... Remember, my hitch was already rated at 500 lbs tongue. This was a reinforcement to keep the carrier from tilting and the deck level. Thanks for your input though!
-Rich
|
|
|
Post by rockynv on Mar 17, 2017 0:56:27 GMT -5
I feel really comfortable with the engineer's software results. He took measurements of ALL the structural metal, hitch, frame, etc., and the software generated the results. When you're talking hauling a motorcycle or scooter, I do believe 500-800 lbs can be carried by most... Remember, my hitch was already rated at 500 lbs tongue. This was a reinforcement to keep the carrier from tilting and the deck level. Thanks for your input though! -Rich I find most out there narrow sighted in this reguard and do not take a 4 corner weight of the vehicle on a scale first in order to do correct calculations nor do they calculate impact loads based on the spring and shock absorber ratings nor do they consider tire ratings and inflation tables. You have to survey the entire vehicle front to back. A 400 lb load placed 4 or so feet from the receiver and 20 some feet from the rear axle centers has a lot leverage and can really lighten the weight on the front axles even if the frameset can withstand the forces involved. The unknowing simply reading this may try to do the same without understanding all thats involved which is what gets very many folks into trouble. I have seen a lot of damaged motor homes at dealers that people were trying to get rid of after overloading the rear frames. The damage to the main cross frame over the rear axle can be very severe however most won't see it since its many times buried out of sight. Some even had the entire rear frame with the spare tire subframe or generator set come down dragging on the roadway since the guy who modified the hitch did not consult the RV Builders engineers. Remember that 500 lb tongue is within a foot of the receiver not a few feet back and its a tongue weight not a dead weight with its higher shock loads.
|
|
|
Post by SylvreKat on Mar 17, 2017 8:28:06 GMT -5
Not to argue since I have zero skills with weight distribution etc, but it looks to me like all Rich did was add a second support to stabilize his carrier, 'cause it looks the same distance out as in the original photo. Which seems like such a simple solution to the tilting of his carrier, yet nobody's created a solution before (at least not that they've publicized)
Me, I say good job, Big Guy!
>'Kat
|
|
|
Post by rockynv on Mar 17, 2017 12:30:09 GMT -5
It's actually SOP to add two additional receivers to balance the load instead of just a locking collar on the main hitch when putting a motor bike carrier on a motor home. Some will go the extra and put a caster style wheel with a highway tire on it underneath the bike carrier after monting it to a hinge type coupling. A bike on the back of a motorhome can be like elderly Archamidies moving the world because he was handed a long enough lever to do so. I have most of the stock set aside to do the two receiver setup on mine and just have not been up to it. Confirmed with the Coach Builders that while the hitch is rated for 1,000 lbs tongue weight that the rear frames which are already supporting a few tons of coach plus a large propane tank and 5 KW Generator set are only capable of supporting a tongue weight of 400 lbs in addition to what they are already carrying as is the same with the rear axle and tires. Most times this is what we are talking about: With whats underneath several feet shorter and added onto with much lighter duty materials:
|
|
|
Post by bigguy on Mar 17, 2017 19:21:09 GMT -5
Okay, so I'll take these points one at a time. As a former truck driver I am very aware of load distribution. And since my Ford truck dealer offers me free four corner weights, I take advantage of that. I have not had it weighed since the mod, but I plan to. Prior to the mod, I had three different corner weights done and made adjustments accordingly to the storage to correct as best as possible. I also had a Cat weight done. I have a 228 WB, 22K GVW and axled out at 7420 front, and 12,960 rear with a full tank of gas and propane and 3/4 fresh water, 3/4 black, with passengers. Everything, including tires was a go and my weight distribution was nearly perfect. All three water tanks are either at, or in front of the rear axle.
My load hasn't changed. I did not move the receiver any further back. All I did was add an extra support to prevent tilt and add stability, plus take some of the load off the main support for the carrier, which is plugged into a 9" extension. It is 31" from the hitch to the scooter wheels.
Agreed. And with that said, I'm assuming that you're suggesting a disclaimer on the article in the blog. I'll take that advise and get that done. I'm long winded to begin with, so I usually publish with the less is more attitude, but in this case, you're right, I should add more...
I am not that far back, It's 31 inches from the hitch to the tire rail.
My F53 rides on two six or eight inch U rails, I don't remember which, front to rear, with several cross supports. In the rear, there is a 10mm U cross frame connecting the two rails with two 45 degree six foot corner supports. The trailer hitch is both welded to the U cross member and bolted to the upper frame. I have been under the motorhome many times while on the lift at the shop and there are no extensions on the main supports that I can see, but even if there were, done properly it wouldn't make a difference. It appears they run front to back, one piece.
I appreciate your input and I will go ahead and put a disclaimer in the blog post... thanks!
-Rich
|
|
|
Post by bigguy on Mar 17, 2017 19:26:57 GMT -5
Not to argue since I have zero skills with weight distribution etc, but it looks to me like all Rich did was add a second support to stabilize his carrier, 'cause it looks the same distance out as in the original photo. Which seems like such a simple solution to the tilting of his carrier, yet nobody's created a solution before (at least not that they've publicized) Me, I say good job, Big Guy! >'Kat Thanks Kat! I think the point he was making is, someone is going to overload their motorhome unknowingly, just because someone else did it. Most RVers don't even know what a 4 corner weight is. Some know how to balance with a truck scale, but most just hit the road, overweight and unbalanced and wonder why they can't handle the drive! He brought out some good points and a disclaimer is indeed in order! -Rich
|
|
|
Post by oldchopperguy on Mar 18, 2017 12:00:12 GMT -5
Looks like you did your homework pretty well! Have a bone!You're right though, a disclaimer IS in order. You can bet some Bozo will try to somehow carry a Honda Gold Wing or Harley bagger with a sidecar attached... or, maybe one of those reverse-trikes with a car motor/tranny..... Or maybe a Smart Car, T-Bucket street-rod or Lord only knows what else... Lots of folks treat stupidity as a virtue... Yup. Wishing you great success!Leo in Texas
|
|
|
Post by bigguy on Mar 18, 2017 20:29:15 GMT -5
Looks like you did your homework pretty well! Have a bone! Back at ya Leo! oldchopperguy
One of these days I have to get over there and crack a few cold ones with you! -Rich
|
|
|
Post by rockynv on Mar 19, 2017 10:39:26 GMT -5
Yep too few RV builders match the OEM chassis when they extend it with many dropping the frame extensions to just a 4" channel. Then you have some builders comming out with economy models by using a short chassis with longer frame extensions out there. You have to do your homework on what the Coach Builder did and can't just go with Big Guy or Rocky did it so its fine for eveyone out there regardless of the class, make and model motor home they have.
Like I said I have surveyed a good many Class A motorhomes that had sagging rear frames with a hump in the floor rearward of the drive axle due to the use of hitch carriers that they set too far out from the back of the coach or even doubled up to carry two bikes. It really hasn't been until the past few years or so that they started building that many on gas chassis much over 20,000 to 22,000 lbs capacity. Prior to the year 2000 most gas powered motor homes were on 12,000 to 18,000 lb chassis and were so overloaded with just the coach that once you put in the people there was only reserve left for 1,000 lbs of food, clothing, camping gear, etc. If you used full sized frame extensions on those you could have been left with no capacity for people or gear. Put a 400 lb bike 3 feet out from the receiver on one of those and you barely have capacity for people.
BTW: Is that the Harbor Freight carrier? I find the receiver collar on that one not quite effective to, along with the ramp being a tad too short when loading a bike that weighs over 300 lbs.
|
|
|
Post by oldchopperguy on Mar 19, 2017 13:08:53 GMT -5
Looks like you did your homework pretty well! Have a bone! Back at ya Leo! oldchopperguy
One of these days I have to get over there and crack a few cold ones with you! -Rich Rich, That would be great! With my missus being in poor health, I'm not likely to ever get very far from home, but if you ever get around the Dallas/Fort Worth area, let's get together. It's still a pretty long ride on a scooter from Louisiana... LOL! Ride safe, Leo
|
|