|
|
Post by kevinharrell on Feb 12, 2018 6:26:32 GMT -5
Which 1960s Batman villain is more macho? The Riddler  The Joker  |
|
|
|
Post by flyangler on Feb 12, 2018 9:47:19 GMT -5
The Joker, it's the make-up
|
|
|
|
Post by SylvreKat on Feb 12, 2018 10:22:10 GMT -5
The Riddler. Look at those crazy-eyes. You figure he's gonna make the first move.
|
|
|
|
Post by wheelbender6 on Feb 12, 2018 18:28:49 GMT -5
Joker. There is no way that Jack Nicholson would have ever played the part of that wormy Riddler.
|
|
|
|
Post by oldchopperguy on Feb 12, 2018 21:28:53 GMT -5
Close call... The classic TV Batman characters were pretty much "kid-friendly" so maybe not quite so much "creepy macho" as the later movie characters... Even Batman himself was a tad less "macho" than the butt-kicking movie characters... You all know the old story: "Never trust a guy who wears his boxers OUTSIDE his pants... LOL! I guess I lean toward the Joker because he reminds me of a "kinder, gentler Killer Clown"... LOL!  THAT is about as macho as the old TV characters got... Not exactly Charlie Manson... But macho enough to impress us as little nippers. |
|
|
|
Post by wheelbender6 on Feb 12, 2018 22:02:54 GMT -5
The villain King Tut should get honorable mention. He always traveled with a harem. The text says the girl is Lee Meriwether.  |
|
