|
Post by kevinharrell on Apr 24, 2017 19:19:55 GMT -5
Which bird is more macho? Chicken Duck
|
|
|
Post by wheelbender6 on Apr 24, 2017 20:06:34 GMT -5
Ducks are seasonally monogamous. Advantage, chickens. Who has ever heard of "duck fighting"? Advantage, chickens.
|
|
|
Post by bandito2 on Apr 25, 2017 1:23:12 GMT -5
Watch out! ..... DUCK!!! How bout this... ducking is a chicken s#it move. B'sides, guys dig chicks and roosters (male chickens) are known as cocks. Nobody ever asked why the duck crossed the road so that must have been unimportant. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck... Not much macho about mundane obviousness compared to the daring and unpredictability of playing chicken. And sitting ducks?... macho?... really?... No way!! Well, I think you get the idea. So my vote is for the chicken. A joke I heard as a kid. (still, I was informed and old enough to get it) which came first, the chicken or the egg?....... actually it was the rooster that came first.
|
|
|
Post by flyangler on Apr 25, 2017 2:59:27 GMT -5
Chicken, I think bandito2 covered it.^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
Post by SylvreKat on Apr 25, 2017 7:00:07 GMT -5
I was going to be undecided, but can't argue bandito's logic there.
|
|
|
Post by spandi on Apr 25, 2017 10:30:36 GMT -5
I like Daffy, I'm going with the duck. " Rabbit season!"
|
|
|
Post by wheelbender6 on Apr 25, 2017 18:03:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by wheelbender6 on Apr 25, 2017 18:09:58 GMT -5
There is no "Year of the Duck" in Chinese astrology. Advantage, chicken.
|
|
|
Post by oldchopperguy on Apr 29, 2017 21:22:31 GMT -5
I'm going with "duck"...
OK, CHICKENS have the advantage, admitted. But DUCKS get shot at. That has to count for something... And there's no "Chicken Commander" Red Neck guys on TV. And some of THE most macho guys I knew in the Army were Vietnamese soldiers named "Duk"... Alright, I suppose I'm pushing the envelope.Hey, wait a minute... Chickens are GOOD for you to eat. No macho there... Ducks are plum chocked-full of cholesterol! THAT could KILL you if you ate enough of 'em. THAT has GOT to add to the macho factor ... Chickens aren't likely to kill you unless you're trying to miss one crossing the road and hit wet leaves... Yup... I dunno... This is sorta like wondering which is more macho: Hamster or Gerbil...
|
|
|
Post by SylvreKat on Apr 30, 2017 7:13:51 GMT -5
Hamster--no wait, gerbil--no, hamster--uh......
|
|
|
Post by kevinharrell on Apr 30, 2017 10:30:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by oldchopperguy on Apr 30, 2017 21:09:55 GMT -5
Kevinharrell, Gotta love that badazz rat! Have a bone on The Old Chopper Guy...
I don't remember the hamster/gerbil macho pole, but you may have. But then, my memory isn't what it used to be...In my personal experience, I've had both gerbils and hamsters as a kid. Most of my hamsters were pretty aggressive, willing to take a piece out my finger. Most of my gerbils were pretty docile, happy to curl up in my hand and go to sleep. Of course, some of our stalwart Hollywood stars figured out ways to "boldly send Gerbils where they never went before"... But THAT may be more "sick" than "macho"... My only rat "experience" involved a very docile, chubby fellow who would also go to sleep in my hand, and, relieve himself during the nap... EEEWWW! I've always had a soft spot for furry little critters, especially those Guinea Pigs with their "bed-head" fur growing in all directions... LOL! Keep up the macho poles! You have some great ones! Leo in Texas
|
|