New Rider
Currently Offline
Posts: 5 
Likes: 0
Joined: Aug 26, 2015 16:31:08 GMT -5
|
Post by pl4y3r on Sept 2, 2015 0:19:47 GMT -5
Does anyone think that yamaha is ever going to bring the aerox to the usa i like zumas dont get me wrong but the aerox is a beast i owned a 2001 yamaha zuma 2 stroke but the new ones are ugly bug eye head lights dude just make it look ugly on the new ones
|
|
|
|
Post by horace on Sept 2, 2015 15:36:59 GMT -5
2 stroke is the issue...... The U.S. has a big problem with getting "certified" in all 50 States. California emissions are an especially troublesome factor in production of Motor Vehicles from other countries. For example: The Hennasey Viper took over 2 1/2 years to get what is basically a Lotus Exige street legal.... Even though it is built in Texas........ ( This is an Extreme example ) "off road use only" is a common phrase for aftermarket parts because of the EPA/DOT rules and regulations..... Burning more gas cleaner is better for business than using less gas more efficiently...... NO, the Aerox will not be road legal anytime soon in the USA..... Bummer  |
|
Freshman Rider
Currently Offline
New scoot!
Posts: 71
Likes: 11
Joined: Feb 28, 2013 14:48:25 GMT -5
|
yamaha aerox
by: Skunk Shampoo - Sept 4, 2015 13:35:37 GMT -5
Post by Skunk Shampoo on Sept 4, 2015 13:35:37 GMT -5
The Yamaha Zuma is a beautiful rugged ATV of a scooter. I do think it looks better with the vertical headlight setup, though. My main issue with the horizontal setup is that it only lights up one of the lights. It looks lopsided like one of the lights is out. Wouldn't be a problem with the vertical setup. Speaking of buggy headlights  That's unfortunate about the Aerox, though. I've heard something about modern fuel injected two-strokes being capable of meeting emission guidelines. Maybe a future version of the Aerox will make its way over. |
|
